The United Kingdom executive needs a brand new definition of Islamophobia and has created a running crew of politicians, teachers and unbiased professionals to supply one. It objectives to settle long-running political debates over the time period.
The concept that of Islamophobia describes anti-Muslim and anti-Islamic prejudices and their affect on Muslim communities. The time period become acquainted in the United Kingdom following e-newsletter of the Runnymede Believe record, Islamophobia: A Problem for Us All, in 1997.
The concept that is now used to speak about destructive public opinion in opposition to Muslims and Islam, biased media reporting, verbal and bodily attacks and on-line assaults. It’s also used when discussing social and financial inequalities, discrimination inside more than a few institutional settings and unfair remedy from the police and safety services and products.
Earlier definitions had been arguable, failing to unite politicians, teachers and British Muslims, and resulting in charged debates over loose speech.
Some teachers have argued that the observe “Islamophobia” – which implies a phobia or concern of Islam – is an erroneous label for a prejudice which regularly goals pores and skin color, ethnicity and tradition.
Many Muslim-led organisations settle for that the time period is imperfect and interchangeable with others equivalent to “anti-Muslim hatred”. Alternatively, they handle the time period “Islamophobia” is had to focal point consideration on a rising downside.
Definitions and controversy
The 1997 Runnymede Believe record outlined Islamophobia as an “unfounded hostility towards Islam”, “the practical consequences of such hostility in unfair discrimination against Muslim individuals and communities” and “the exclusion of Muslims from mainstream political and social affairs”.
The Runnymede Believe revised its definition in a follow-up record revealed in 2017. The record defines Islamophobia in two tactics.
The primary is “anti-Muslim racism”. An extended, 2d model amends the United Country’s 1965 definition of “racial discrimination”. Those revised definitions are vital as a result of they re-framed Islamophobia as a made from racist pondering fairly than non secular prejudices.
Different makes an attempt to outline Islamophobia come with British educational Chris Allen’s 200-word definition. Allen outlined it as an ideology like racism that spreads destructive perspectives of Muslims and Islam, influencing social attitudes and resulting in discrimination and violence. US political scientist Erik Bleich outlined it extra succinctly as “indiscriminate negative attitudes or emotions directed at Islam or Muslims”.
In 2018, the all-party parliamentary crew on British Muslims revealed every other definition linking Islamophobia to racism. In step with the APPG, “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.” The APPG known as for its definition to be legally binding.
The APPG definition was once followed through more than a few organisations together with native government, UK universities and the Labour social gathering whilst in opposition. Nevertheless it was once rejected through the then Conservative executive and later through the present Labour executive, which argued it was once looking for “a more integrated and cohesive approach”.
This loss of consensus over earlier definitions led Angela Rayner, the deputy high minister, to announce the running crew in March 2025. The gang’s intention is to supply a brand new definition of “anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia” which is “reflective of a wide range of perspectives and priorities for British Muslims”.
Former Conservative MP and legal professional normal Dominic Grieve was once appointed to chair the crowd, proof of Labour’s ambition to construct consensus.
A march in London towards Islamophobia, racism and anti-migrant perspectives.
Shutterstock
Some are involved that use of the time period “Islamophobia”, and in particular the APPG definition, stifles authentic grievance of Islam. Loose speech campaigners have argued that it’s “blasphemy via the back door”.
The centre-right thinktank Coverage Change revealed a record claiming that the time period is utilized in dangerous religion to divert consideration clear of severe social issues inside some Muslim communities – in particular, dialogue of the grooming gangs scandal.
Those debates undergo resemblance to these surrounding the time period “antisemitism” and the adoption of a definition proposed through the World Holocaust Memorial Alliance. The time period is extensively permitted, even though critics have argued this particular definition stifles authentic grievance of the Israeli state.
A brand new means
A brand new definition of “Islamophobia” should stability the safety of Muslim communities and freedoms of faith, expression and meeting for all Muslims and non-Muslims in the United Kingdom. It should be transparent sufficient for on a regular basis use, particular sufficient for tutorial and coverage analysis, and in a position to producing enhance throughout the United Kingdom’s various Muslim inhabitants.
A proposed definition through an rising idea chief on British Islam addresses those demanding situations. Mamnun Khan is a author whose paintings explores the social integration of Muslims in recent British society. Khan is related to Equi, a thinktank which describes its paintings as “drawing on Muslim insight”. Different participants of Equi are participants of the federal government’s running crew.
Khan units out 3 assessments {that a} definition should move, in keeping with Islamic legislation, ethical teachings inside Islam and different extra common values. First, a definition should serve the general public pastime. 2d, it should be simply and balanced and maintain freedom of expression. 3rd, it should uphold the honor of Muslim communities.
For Khan, “Islamophobia, also known as anti-Muslim hatred, is an irrational fear, hostility, or prejudice toward Muslims that leads to discrimination, unequal treatment, exclusion, social and political marginalisation, or violence.”
Khan’s definition has many just right qualities. It brings in combination more potent components of earlier definitions – for, instance, the separation of destructive attitudes and results – with out being weakened through jargon or sturdy political ideology. However, some social scientists would possibly query whether or not defining one thing as “irrational” is an issue of choice fairly than educational analysis.
The running crew should also make a decision whether or not Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hatred are carefully similar or precisely the similar. Failure to take action will motive confusion and inconsistency amongst the ones wishing to use the time period exactly. Regardless, Khan’s instance is a sturdy step in the precise path. A greater definition of Islamophobia is wanted, and now inside succeed in.
