For greater than 3 a long time, Iran attempted and did not silence Girls With out Males (Zanan bedun-e Mardan in Persian). Shahrnush Parsipur’s novella uncovered the brutality of Iranian patriarchy with uncommon readability. It did see you later prior to international audiences recognised that violence.
Printed in 1989, the guide was once banned virtually straight away and Parsipur was once imprisoned two times for writing overtly about girls’s sexuality and autonomy – an act of creative braveness the Islamic Republic deemed insupportable.
In spite of the regime’s makes an attempt to erase it, the novella persevered. It moved via underground networks and crossed borders with quiet resolution. These days, Parsipur lives in exile in northern California after years of harassment. At 80, she stays certainly one of Iran’s maximum fearless literary dissidents.
Girls With out Males follows 5 girls who flee violent marriages, stifling social expectancies, and political chaos. In combination, they construct a sanctuary in a lawn out of doors Iran’s capital, Tehran.
The guide is now to be had in translation by way of Faridoun Farrokh in the United Kingdom for the primary time. It nonetheless reads as a fierce, mystical act of feminist refusal, echoing the Lady, Lifestyles, Freedom motion – a Kurdish slogan that become a rallying cry for girls’s rights when it was once followed right through the 2022 Iranian protests. The guide additionally lays naked, once more, how violently regimes react when girls declare the best to are living unbounded.
When historical past attempted to silence girls however failed
Set towards the turmoil of 1953, the novella unfolds in a charged political panorama. That 12 months, a US- and UK-backed coup toppled Iran’s democratically elected high minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, and reinstalled the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, to offer protection to western oil pursuits. That match reshaped Iran’s long run and stays certainly one of its maximum consequential political ruptures.
Penguin World Writers.
Within the years main as much as the coup, Iranian girls have been inching against higher felony and social equality. However the political chaos and regime alternate set the level for many years of instability. The tensions prepared the ground for the revolution 25 years later, and the Islamic Republic’s tightening grip on girls’s lives. Whilst those seismic occasions keep out of doors the novella’s body, their presence is palpable within the background.
It’s within the shadow of the 1953 coup that Parsipur exposes the intimate humiliations that patriarchy inscribes onto girls’s our bodies. Virginity turns into a weaponised measure of price. Menopause is recast as an insult. Sexuality is monitored, contained and punished. Girls’s wants are handled as destabilising forces that should be disciplined. Each and every persona carries a unique wound from the program.
Munis resists a brother who would quite kill her than permit her freedom. Faizeh absorbs the misogyny that confines her, and turns it inward. Zarrinkolah escapes a lifestyles wherein her frame is without end purchased, bought and ate up. Mahdokht, driven past the boundaries of social expectation, seeks literal rebirth as a tree. Farrokhlaqa endures an prosperous marriage that strips her of dignity.
Those violences replicate the misogyny embedded within the political order itself. That order disciplines girls via disgrace, silence and dependable surveillance in their our bodies.
The ladies’s retreat to the lawn out of doors Tehran isn’t an get away, however a feminist rupture that marks a refusal to are living inside a global that insists on defining them. This can be a option to construct, on the other hand precariously, an area the place the ones laws cave in.
Thru mysticism and magical realism, the ladies’s transformations acquire political pressure. Each and every metamorphosis turns into an act of resistance: girls reclaiming autonomy, dignity and chance in a society intent on erasing them.

A demonstrator holds a sheet appearing footage of sufferers on the anniversary of the loss of life of Mahsa Jina Amini in 2023.
Clemens Bilan/EPA
From 1953 to Lady, Lifestyles, Freedom
The worldwide cry of “zan, zendegi, azadi” (Lady, Lifestyles, Freedom) carries the similar rebel power that animates Parsipur’s Girls With out Males. The slogan rose right through the 2022 rebellion, after the loss of life of Mahsa Jina Amini in police custody.
The start of this spirit of resistance will also be noticed in Parsipur’s narrative, a long time previous. Her novella complex a imaginative and prescient of ladies actively confronting and exceeding patriarchal limits a long time prior to the slogan won international pressure.
Studying the guide nowadays, it’s transparent how appropriately Parsipur mapped the equipment of state violence, gender policing and systemic oppression – the similar forces now using girls into the streets in Iran.
What anchors the radical’s fresh relevance is its central thought: girls imagining and developing a global out of doors patriarchal keep an eye on.
The 5 girls of Parsipur’s tale carve out an area the place they’re not outlined by way of violence or expectation. Their lawn turns into a blueprint for refusal, one who aligns immediately with the ethos of Lady, Lifestyles, Freedom: to not bear patriarchy however to reject it, rewrite it, and construct a lifestyles fully past its succeed in.
Iran is as soon as once more engulfed in turmoil. Girls With out Males enters the United Kingdom at a second when Iranian exiles, students and activists are issuing pressing warnings about escalating state violence. Public consciousness of the day-to-day repression confronted by way of Iranian girls is upper than ever, and international literary circles are increasingly more spotlighting works that confront authoritarianism with resistance.
On this context, the novella’s English-language newsletter operates as a bridge between previous and provide. It makes visual how the buildings that constrained girls’s lives within the Nineteen Fifties proceed to form Iran’s political realities nowadays.
This isn’t merely a reissue. The United Kingdom newsletter marks a troublesome‑received go back for a piece that has outlasted bans, by way of a author who has survived incarceration and compelled displacement. Its re‑access into international move arrives exactly when its research of gendered domination carries heightened relevance.