The beginning of President Donald Trump’s 2nd time period has been a bonanza for the legal professionals normal of blue states. Because the president has launched his snow fall of government orders and axed federal investment and methods on which states depend, those legal professionals normal have filed fits designed to position the brakes on what Trump is attempting to perform.
Because the Washington Submit reported on Feb. 22, 2025, “In the past month alone, multistate coalitions have sued the Trump administration seven times.”
Right here’s one instance: In past due January, 22 states and the District of Columbia requested a federal district court docket in Rhode Island for a short lived restraining order to forestall the Place of job of Control and Finances from halting federal grants and monetary help that will pass to citizens, organizations or governmental entities of their jurisdictions.
In early February, the legal professionals normal of Minnesota, Oregon and Washington sought and had been granted an order to forestall the Trump management from imposing an government order that, in keeping with Lambda Felony, an LGBTQ+ rights advocacy workforce, “targets transgender and gender-diverse youth.”
Nearly per week later, 14 legal professionals normal went to court docket to forestall Elon Musk “from issuing orders to any person in the Executive Branch outside of DOGE and otherwise engaging in the actions of an officer of the United States.”
New York Legal professional Common Letitia James and Connecticut Legal professional Common William Tong each sued to forestall DOGE from acquiring American citizens’ non-public information.
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Pictures
As a scholar of legislation and politics, I see the legal professionals normal movements in opposition to the Trump management as the most recent bankruptcy of an ongoing tale courting to the nineteenth century wherein state officers ward off in opposition to the nationwide govt, respiring lifestyles into this nation’s federal machine. That machine, designed through the framers to offer protection to liberty and as a guard in opposition to tyranny, gave powers to each federal and state governments.
Hybrid function of state legal professionals normal
The paintings of legal professionals normal within the quite a lot of states comes to a mixture of legislation and politics. Because the Nationwide Affiliation of Legal professionals Common describes their function, legal professionals normal are “chief legal officers” and serve “as counselor to state government agencies and legislatures, and as a representative of the public interest.”
Legal professionals normal use the legislation to advance their political targets. Despite the fact that their actual tasks range from state to state, state legal professionals normal don’t utterly eschew politics.
In 43 states, they’re elected officers who run for place of job as partisans. Those applicants be offering methods and promise to take movements which can be usually in keeping with the platforms of the events that nominate them. As lawyer Marissa Smith wrote within the Cornell Legislation Overview, “The position of State AG has long been said to stand for ‘Aspiring Governor’ rather than Attorney General.”
Smith argues that state legal professionals normal “have leaned into our nation’s divisive partisanship – often as an integral part of a quest for higher office – and used their traditional roles and powers to grandstand and showcase their party loyalty on a national stage.”
When, as within the fresh spate of fits, state legal professionals normal pursue the government or any other goal at the nationwide degree, there’s truly no approach for them to lose, politically talking. As journalist Alan Greenblatt writes, “It’s all upside. If a lawsuit succeeds, you achieve a policy goal. If it fails, you’ve still made a name for yourself and often delayed a policy for months and even years,” particularly when that coverage is unpopular.
Suing the government
There’s not anything new about what state legal professionals normal at the moment are doing. At one time or any other, complaints in opposition to the government have come from each Democratic and Republican legal professionals normal.
For instance, throughout the so-called Gilded Age on the finish of the nineteenth century, as a result of their “unique institutional position,” modern state legal professionals normal “were able to serve as opportunity points for the expression of the ‘public interest’ in the absence of administrative mechanisms or actions by other political institutions,” political scientist Paul Nolette writes.
Those legal professionals normal sued railroad corporations and different giant companies, in the hunt for to get state courts to rein within the rising energy of what had been referred to as on the time “robber barons.”
Because the New Deal spread out within the Thirties, some Republican state legal professionals normal attempted to withstand what they noticed as federal govt encroachment on state energy, although the main opposition to the New Deal got here from different political actors.
After the Perfect Court docket’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Schooling choice ordered the desegregation of colleges, a couple of Southern Democratic state legal professionals normal had been all for organizing “massive resistance” within the area, through providing prison recommendation to state officers adverse to the Brown choice and protecting segregation in court docket.
Within the Nineteen Eighties, state legal professionals normal banded in combination to sue federal companies for failing to put into effect the legislation or to put into effect acts of Congress, together with the ones in regards to the deregulation of trade. A decade later, they introduced a concerted marketing campaign of complaints in opposition to main tobacco corporations for the reason that federal govt was once now not, they alleged, adequately regulating the tobacco trade.
And when Barack Obama entered the White Area, state legal professionals normal enthusiastically embraced the function of watchdog and nemesis. Republican state legal professionals normal led the resistance with complaints over well being coverage, immigration and environmental laws, the use of their powers similar to their Democratic opposite numbers are doing nowadays.
Texas Legal professional Common Ken Paxton claims to have sued the Obama management 100 instances.
Justin Lane-Pool/Getty Pictures
Former West Virginia Solicitor Common Elbert Lin, who served as the manager litigator in his state’s lawyer normal’s place of job, tells the tale this manner: “During the eight years of the Obama Administration, states led mostly by Republican attorneys general made it a priority, early and often, to challenge President Obama’s initiatives.”
Considered one of them, Texas’ Greg Abbott, sued the Obama management 31 instances, at one level describing his activity this manner: “I go into the office, I sue the federal government, and I go home.”
All over the primary Trump management, Democratic legal professionals normal endured what had came about underneath Obama. They filed 138 multistate complaints, up from the 78 instances Republicans sued the Obama management.
And on the finish of President Joe Biden’s time period, Ken Paxton, Texas’ Republican lawyer normal, issued a press unencumber announcing that over the former 4 years, he had sued the management 100 instances, calling it “an historic milestone.”
‘Expect to be sued’
Perfect Court docket Justice Louis Brandeis as soon as referred to as states “laboratories of democracy.” Extra just lately, Jeffrey Rosen of the Nationwide Charter Heart praised federalism for proceeding “to promote ideological diversity” in an an increasing number of polarized country.
That range has lengthy been on show in what state legal professionals normal have performed at the nationwide degree.
These days, when some fear that the U.S. constitutional machine is breaking down, state legal professionals normal are looking to notice the founders’ imaginative and prescient of restricted govt. They’re mobilizing prison equipment to vindicate prison claims whilst additionally the use of the courts for political functions.
All presidents will have to be expecting to be sued early and frequently through state legal professionals normal of the other celebration. However as lawyer Jeffrey Toobin writes in The New York Instances, “political victories matter more, and last longer, than court cases” in the US.
Lately, fits introduced through state legal professionals normal have safe the rights of immigrants, defended reproductive rights and asserted state prerogatives in lots of spaces. However whilst those complaints have a very powerful function to play in The usa’s constitutional machine, what electorate do is extra necessary.
Even a success litigation through state legal professionals normal usually brings just a one-time victory, however political motion is had to maintain what they reach in court docket. And their paintings can’t be performed with out the strengthen of the electorate they serve and who, through and massive, elect them.
