Humour performs a key position within the political verbal exchange of rightwing populist leaders in Latin The us. Politicians together with Javier Milei in Argentina, Nayib Bukele in El Salvador and Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil have all used humour to interact with and solidify their make stronger base, normalise excessive ideologies and deflect grievance.
Humour additionally circulates repeatedly amongst their fans. In October 2022, a couple of months sooner than Brazilians went to the polls of their remaining normal election, I performed fieldwork at a Bolsonaro rally within the Brazilian town of Rio de Janeiro with a gaggle of co-workers.
We overheard a Bolsonaro supporter joking a few stray canine. “Watch out for that dog!” he shouted. “If Lula wins, we’ll have to call him picanha [a type of beef].”
The group laughed, with some other supporter including: “If Lula wins, he’ll be the first to eat it.” Lula went directly to be elected as Brazil’s president by means of a razor-thin margin.
Argentina held elections the next 12 months to nominate successors to President Alberto Fernández and his vice-president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner – who had ruled Argentinian politics for twenty years along her husband, Néstor Kirchner. In combination, that they had solid Kirchnerism, the rustic’s primary leftwing populist motion.
At a marketing campaign match, we noticed a Milei supporter additionally creating a funny story about canines (and cats). “Milei is good; he’s a man who likes dogs. His dogs are part of his thinking,” they stated. Every other remarked: “But the Kirchneristas eat cats. Soon we’ll be eating dogs if that mafia continues to rule.”
Such remarks might appear trivial. However they replicate a broader narrative utilized by rightwing populist politicians and their supporters in Latin The us. Jokes about leftist leaders regularly painting them as inhuman, making it more uncomplicated to assault their personality and insurance policies.
Like different rightwing populist leaders in Latin The us, Argentina’s president Javier Milei has used humour to interact his make stronger base.
Oscar Gonzalez Fuentes / Shutterstock
This use of humour by means of rightwing populist politicians additionally serves as a protect. If their statements are criticised, they may be able to declare “it’s just a joke”. This permits them to push aside their detractors as humourless, out-of-touch elites who don’t perceive peculiar other folks.
Milei has again and again brushed aside objections to his branding of critics as zurditos (“little left-handed ones”), a pejorative time period for leftists in Argentina. He has, now and then, defended or downplayed such language as “just humour”, irony or a part of his unfiltered verbal exchange taste, reasonably than severe political discourse.
Bukele, too, has used humour on social media to downplay accusations of authoritarianism. He modified his name on Twitter (now X) to “dictator” in 2021, an ironic touch upon protests towards him over perceived democratic backsliding that 12 months. He later modified it to “the coolest dictator in the world”.
Roots of humour
Latin American rightwing populist actions don’t seem to be on my own of their use of humour. Equivalent political actions in different places additionally use it as a strategic device for recruitment, to deflect grievance and to normalise excessive ideologies.
However to know why humour so successfully helps political polarisation in Latin The us, it’s vital to recognise its historical past within the area.
Throughout centuries formed by means of inequality, slavery and authoritarian rule, repression has been normalised thru refined way. This has incorporated humour.
The 20 th-century dictatorships of Jorge Rafael Videla in Argentina (1976-1981) and Augusto Pinochet in Chile (1973-1990) justified violence and repression by means of the usage of techniques very similar to the ones hired by means of fresh rightwing actions. Possibly maximum significantly, this took the type of portraying combatants as inhuman.
In each international locations, legit state media within the dictatorship generation used caricatures to depict dissidents as gruesome figures or unhealthy animals. Phrases like subversivos (subversives) have been intentionally woven into jokes by means of army officers and regime-aligned entertainers to trivialise repression and provide persecution as one thing that may be laughed at.
Cartoons and TV sketches regularly portrayed industry unionists and pupil activists as bumbling subversivos whose intended incompetence made them ridiculous, reasonably than politically reliable. In Chile, jokes circulating in mass media likened alleged subversivos to infiltrators or vermin who had to be “cleaned up”.

Montage of memes on Telegram: Milei depicted in a ridicule non-binary funny story, Lula portrayed as excrement urging citizens to ‘flush’, and Bukele as a medieval warrior combating dehumanised gang contributors.
Gabriel Bayarri, CC BY-NC-ND
At the present time, memes and on-line jokes focused on political adversaries and marginalised teams reflect those patterns. Authoritarian leaders in Latin The us are regularly depicted on social media platforms as hyper-masculine heroes, whilst their enemies are mocked as creatures like rats or cockroaches.
This dynamic used to be observed right through Brazil’s 2022 election. Fernando Haddad, a key best friend of Lula and now the rustic’s minister of finance, used to be regularly depicted as a cockroach in memes circulating round pro-Bolsonaro teams on Telegram. Such messaging portrayed him as a parasitic determine threatening the country’s financial steadiness.
Such strategic use of humour by means of rightwing populists and their supporters poses a vital problem for democracy in Latin The us. It could possibly undermine public consider in establishments, encourages reactionary actions, and weakens social concord by means of fostering department.
A deeper figuring out of humour’s position in radicalisation no longer handiest is helping cut back its corrosive results. It additionally creates alternatives for development extra inclusive, resilient and democratic types of political discourse.