After the impressive housebreaking on the Louvre in Paris, a lot of museum administrators from world wide confirmed unity and defended the museum as an open position. In an open letter to the “Mond” newspaper, 57 representatives of most sensible world homes improve the top of the Louvre, Laurence de Vehicles.
Information
Z+ (subscription content material); Theft within the Louvre: Surprise for Paris.
“Our institutions are not spared from the cruelty of the world,” the letter says. Museums are more and more the objective of violent assaults. What came about to the Louvre is “among the greatest fears of museum professionals.” Some signatories have already skilled one thing identical.
Open museums as an alternative of fortresses
The assault, as reported, hit no longer simplest the Paris museum, but additionally the theory of the museum itself – the duty of sharing the typical heritage of humanity with as many of us as imaginable. “Museums are places of communication and wonder,” write the administrators. “They help us see the world through different eyes.”
“Museums are neither bastions nor safes,” the letter says. Despite the fact that the homes will have to create protected areas for artwork and the general public, their true which means lies “in their openness and accessibility.”
Complaint of security features
Distinguished names come with Marion Ackermann, president of the Prussian Basis for Cultural Heritage, Christoph Scherricks of the Museum of Fashionable Artwork in New York, Nicholas Cullinan of the British Museum in London and Emily Gordenker, basic director of the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam.
Jewels value round 88 million euros had been stolen in a housebreaking greater than every week in the past – a robbery that brought about no longer simplest horror but additionally sharp complaint of security features on the world-renowned museum.
© dpa-infocom, dpa:251027-930-211408/2
